Showing posts with label talent management technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label talent management technology. Show all posts

Friday, 20 September 2013

Employee Engagement: Pivotal to Talent Management

When we work with clients we see that engagement plays as key a role in Talent Management as it does in Organisational Performance.
We all know the research and the resulting stats surrounding employee engagement: which show that a stronger engaged workforce will demonstrate an increase in productivity, a reduction absenteeism, a leap in creativity - but how often do we look at employee engagement as a critical component of our day-to-day talent management activities?
Without engagement in your appraisal and performance management processes, or your talent reviews or your succession planning programmes, any actions planned can become little more than tick-box, form filling exercises.
But how do you plan to increase this engagement - and indeed do you know from where you are starting?
Good questions - and ones we are help our clients to grapple with right now.

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

Can you spot high potential?


In many organisations, the HR team is able to identify those with high potential – and knows how to
develop this. But for some organisations, spotting high potential can be a tricky business – and
especially so for line managers as traditional career paths no longer, if they ever, necessarily
enable the leaders of the future to rise to the top.

At Head Light, we see that two of the main challenges which impact the identification of potential are:

• Projection
• Detection

Let us explain.

To find the future stars of the organisation, line managers need to identify and understand what the
early markers of High Potential (HiPo) are. That is, what are the behavioural precursors of superior
performance in more complex or more senior roles? This involves a bit of projection and
extrapolation. Often these precursors or indicators are identified by carrying out biographical career
interviews with current high performers and looking back at what set them apart at an early stage in
their career. A crystal ball would be helpful though...

Once you know what you’re looking for, then you have to assess for it and find ways to detect it.
Traditionally this has been done by gut feel (“I know it when I see it!”), line manager evaluation or
performance appraisal. The main difficulty of these approaches is that they all rely on the view of
one individual (and it is usually the line manager) and they are typically based on an assessment of
performance in the current role, and that may not afford the individual the opportunity to
demonstrate broader capability or potential.

Evaluations that are reliant on one perspective are, of course, also subject to a number of cognitive
biases, which are naturally very hard to manage or mitigate against:  The Horns Effect; The ‘Face Fits’ bias. .
In addition to these biases, if the manager-subordinate relationship is not a happy one, this may
well affect judgement regarding current performance and future potential.

So what's to be done?


Psychology and technology have offered us a wide range of means by which we can more robustly
and reliably assess potential – although access to these is not always at a line manager level.  Assessment centres are often used to test for future potential - as are some psychometric tests. More recently, we see the emergence of 360 degree feedback as a means for picking up those HiPo markers but if course this can only be used with those already within the organisation.

But it does make sense to embed the means to ‘assess’ the potential for bigger and more complex roles into current talent management and HR practices so if you and your line managers are already using 360 review as one of one of the processes which help you to manage talent within the business, with only a slight adaptation, it could used to look for ‘high potential’ thereby providing more information and keeping costs to a minimum.


So how can we at Head Light help?

Some organisations are very clear on what ‘potential’ looks like and in our experience, there are a number of attributes which tend to predict success in higher-level roles. Common ‘HiPo’ indicators are:

• Capacity for learning – being able to learn from own mistakes, actively seeking feedback
and using it constructively to inform future performance, reflecting on own behaviour
to learn lessons for the future, being a quick learner and able to learn in a number of
different ways

• Resilience – being able to recover quickly from setbacks, coping with high pressure and
demands, finding ways around obstacles; perseverance in the face of adversity.

• Strategic thinking – longer-term thinking, looking outside the organisation for
opportunities, seeing patterns, trends, themes and relationships, being able to manage
ambiguity and deal with increasingly complex issues, problems, timescales and
information, systems thinking, seeing things from an organisational perspective.

• Flexibility – being able to adapt communication, influencing, leadership and interpersonal
style to suit the demands of the situation and the other people involved, managing change,
shifting one’s approach in response to new priorities.

• Emotional intelligence – being able to accurately recognise and manage one’s own
emotional states, recognising and understanding emotional responses in others, using this
understanding to increase interpersonal effectiveness.

• Drive and motivation – being a ‘self-starter’, actively seeking out opportunities to learn
and stretch oneself, showing a drive to make a difference, actively managing and planning
a career, setting stretching personal goals.

Building on this, we have developed the functionality within our award-winning Talent 360® tool to ‘flag’ some of the indicators within a 360 questionnaire as ‘high potential markers’, thereby supporting the line
manager in his or her need to identify these.

These ‘markers’ are not shown when people complete the questionnaire, and they may be existing
indicators across as number of different competencies. But when a report is generated, however,
the software looks at the ratings given to these indicators and produces a composite HiPo score,
providing a useful visual summary on a separate page.

If you want to see how this looks in practice, then please do get in touch.


Tuesday, 9 April 2013

The ups and the downs of moving on-line for performance review


If you’re an organisation which has already invested significant time, resource and energy into the design and roll-out of a performance management process, the last thing you may want to hear is how much better it is if you now move on-line!

Our recent research looked at the criticisms and downsides as reported by those who are still working with an off-line process, and also reported on the benefits as seen by those who have made the move to an on-line system to support their performance management and review activities.

Interesting reading.

The most common criticism seems to be the lack of consistency across the organisation in the way in which objectives are set with 71% reporting this.  This lack of organisational view of objectives is also reported by 31% and a difficulty in monitoring performance across the organisation by 34% of those completing the survey.

Time is seen as a key downside – with 71% saying that the line managers say that the process takes too long – and yet, those who have moved on-line report that whilst there are great business advantages to the move, time saving is not a significant one.  Only 20% say the sessions are shorter and the meetings taking place with more or less the same frequency – and three quarters report the performance review sessions take the length of same time. 

So what are the benefits to moving to on-line performance review? Better quality seems to be the major shift. 

The quality of the conversation improves.
·         Just over half report that performance is tackled more readily.
·         A quarter see managers themselves become better coaches.

The quality in performance increases.
·         Two thirds have seen an increase in the quality of performance.
·         80% see there to be better goal alignment between the individual and those of the organisation.
·         Two thirds have witnessed a greater achievement of objectives.

If you’d like to know more about our research or are looking to see how moving on-line with your performance review can bring these benefits, do call us.

Thursday, 21 March 2013

Speedy problem resolution and round the clock ‘up-time’


When you’ve chosen to implement an on-line talent management system, you want a service that is available to your people when they need it  - and any problems or questions you have, resolved and answered as speedily as possible.

And that’s what we commit to.

Year after year we invest in our own people and systems to better support our customers and we are delighted with the service level statistics we have achieved for 2012.

During the last 12 months we:

·         Achieved 99.999% service availability on a 24 x 7 basis.
·         ‘Closed’ support calls made to us on average in 43 minutes.
·         99.2% of support calls were closed within one working day.
·         90.4% of support calls were closed on the same working day.

And we’re looking to improve on this for this year.  Watch this space!